Both sides, either Darul Da’wah wal irsyad (DDI) or University of Al-Asy’ariah Mandar (Unasman) have good intentions to make peace. This was conveyed by one Senator of DPD RI, Pardi (Jakarta), at the opening of hearings held by the Committee III DPD RI with the Mediation Team of Regional of Representatives (DPRD) Polewali Mandar District on Monday (31/1/2011) in Meeting Room 3rd Floor PPUU DPD RI Building B, Senayan – Jakarta.

Jamar Yasin Badu, Vice Chairman of the Mediation Team revealed that in fact both parties have submitted the Concept draft of Peace to his team.

The dispute of Unasman campus itself is actually has emerged since 2005 between Unasman, involving the stronghold of Professor Sahabuddin through his heirs, with the stronghold of DDI represented by Professor Muis Kabri. The dispute continued until it empties into legal channels. In the District Court, Professor Sahabuddin win. But the appeal and cassation in the Supreme Court level is won by the DDI stronghold with the release of Supreme Court decision in 2009 to execute Unasman.

Samsul Samad, Member of the Mediation Team confirmed that the ruling of the Supreme Court are true. “Yes, it ensures legal decision but it does not guarantee a sense of justice,” he said.

At this moment, Unasman has students of about 15 thousands people where if the execution is carried out it will really disrupt the teaching-learning process. In addition, the decisions on which the basic execution is not considered feasible (non-executable), based on the ruling which states that all legal products of Unasman are not legally binding. In other wordsis, the law is affecting the status of illegal for public institutions Unasman with all its legal product in the form of a diploma, the alumni who are thousands in number and most of them are working in government and private institutions of West Sulawesi.

Muhammad Syibli Sahabuddin (West Sulawesi) added that the decision was legally flawed because the law of the High Court has no authority to dissolve an institution. “It is the authority of the State Administrative Court,” he said.

Sahabuddin also asserted that Unasman did not reject the law, but rejected the legal decisions that injure the sense of justice and humanity.

Ending the hearings, Committee III and Mediation Team hope that this problem can be resolved, immediately because it drains time and energy. The Mediation Team, chaired by Andi Mappangara is also hoped that both sides can meet in one table to resolve the existing problems.

Tulisan ini tersedia dalam: Bahasa

Bagikan