The RDPU of Committee II With Forest Watch Indonesia, Prof. Bambang Hero Saharjo (Forestry Specialist) And Nursya Aisyah (Legal Expert) discussed the Bill on the Prevention and Eradication of Illegal Logging, the introduction and the opening of the meeting by the Chairman of Committee II DPD RI, Ir.H. Bambang Susilo, MM, then the meeting was hosted by Chairman of Working Team Bill on the Prevention and Eradication of Illegal Logging, M. Syukur (DPD RI Senator from Jambi) in Committee II meeting room on the 3^rd floor, Building B DPD RI, Senayan, Jakarta, Tuesday (25/01/2011).

Prof.Dr.Ir.Bambang Hero Saharjo, M. AGR (IPB forestry experts) asserted that the problem which is also a key factor of Illegal logging bill is the appointment status as forest area, enclave, permit in the release of forests, forest status, and its use in the region ( province) are not in the bill and has not been determined its RTRWP, as quoted in his speech “the law of prevention and eradication of illegal logging would not be useful if in the end it refers to the Law No.14 Year 1999 on forestry and its derivatives, if there isn’t any significant correction , there won’t be any political will and spirit to save the environment from destruction “he said.

“Is there a special court or a lex specialis in this Bill that is possible in Indonesia, because there has been many special courts, especially the Ad Hoc, which is associated with specific rules, reversed proof, this has not been well known, how about this illegal logging bill “asked Hj. Hairiah, SH., MH (West Kalimantan). Responding to Hairiah questions, Nursya Aisyah (law expert) explained that the lex specialis of ad hoc judges are recruited by different reasons and the authorities have not been regulated by the law, therefore, the judge will be taken from the forestry civil servants, but it will eventually lead to a conflict of interest “he said

The RDPU of Committee II DPD RI resulted in several conclusions including the Bill on Prevention and Eradication of Illegal Logging that has not explained the appointment of authorized institutions in the crime of illegal logging, and it needs a clear limitation on the State losses, the volume of timber and the need to clarify the functions and duties between the law enforcement agency, so there is no overlap in combating illegal logging, the Commission on the Prevention and Eradication of Illegal Logging in this bill has no independence because in that commission structure, it is still held by the Ministry of Forestry which this commission can be used as a political tool. The Bill on Prevention and Eradication of illegal logging must be synchronized with the Law of Environmental Protection and Management because the forest damage can not be separated from environmental issues.

Tulisan ini tersedia dalam: Bahasa

Bagikan