Problems in the Implementation of the Papua Special Autonomy (Otsus)

“Law No. 21 Year 2001 about Special Autonomy for Papua Province is a policy of strategic value in order to improve service, accelerate development and empowerment of all people in Papua province, especially the indigenous Papuans. But the substance of the Special Autonomy Law is no longer able to accommodate socio-political dynamics in Papua. Even after 9 (nine) years of the Papua Special Autonomy (2001-2010), this policy has not been able to be implemented effectively, “says Dr. Mohammad A. Musa’ad, M. Si (Cendrawasih University) as a resource in the 8 th plenary meeting of the Special Committee Evaluation Team of Special Autonomy of Papua and West Papua who is chaired by Drs. Paulus Yohanes Sumino, MM (DPD senator from Papua) on Tuesday (19/10), in Meeting Room 1st Floor Building A DPD RI (next to the East Java Province), DPD RI, Parliament Complex in Senayan, Jakarta.

“It is better that Papua should follow in the footsteps of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD), by promoting religious shariah in running the Special Autonomy,” said Drs. H. Mudaffar Sjah, Bc.Hk (North Maluku).

However, it is straightened out by Musa’ad, Papua has a culture of many tribes that there are 3 (three) model of leadership, the first is royal such as in Raja Ampat and Fak-Fak regency, Second is chiefs who have power that are usually in the mountains, The third is mixture. So, it is difficult to promote such religious shari’ah in Aceh (NAD). Therefore, it is required for identification problem and its causes, and various adjustments of ideas through further meetings by inviting the stake holders and academics to formulate problem-solving stages and formats of governance through the Reconstruction of the Papua Special Autonomy Law.

Tulisan ini tersedia dalam: Bahasa

Bagikan  

No comments yet... Be the first to leave a reply!

WP-Highlight